Corrections policy.

PeptideRadar covers a literature that is fast-moving and frequently misrepresented. We treat accuracy as the core of the brand, and we correct errors openly rather than quietly.

How we correct errors

When we find or are shown a factual error, we fix it and append a dated correction note to the affected article rather than silently editing the text. Substantive changes — a revised mechanism claim, a corrected citation, a regulatory update — are logged on the page so readers can see what changed and when.

Updates vs. corrections

An update adds new information (for example, a new study or a regulatory development) to a page that was accurate when published. A correction fixes something that was wrong. Both are dated. Our reviewer sign-off line at the foot of each research article records the most recent review date.

Report an error

If you spot a factual mistake, a broken or misleading link, or a claim that isn't supported by the cited source, email corrections@peptideradar.net. Include the page URL and, where possible, the primary source that supports the correction. We review every report.

Sourcing standard

Research pages cite PubMed-indexed or primary sources. We do not cite vendor marketing as evidence, and we distinguish clearly between animal data, human trial data, and mechanistic hypothesis throughout.